Thu Feb 20, 2014, 08:30am
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manny A
Yes. The language says:
"A catch shall not be credited if:
.
.
.
c. The fielder uses any equipment or part of her uniform that is displaced from its proper position."
There is no mention of intent in "c". So even if the ball inadvertently rolls into her removed helmet/mask, it still meets the language of "c".
Now, if, for example, the ball had somehow rolled into her jersey or behind her chest protector, and she reaches in and grabs the ball before it falls to the ground, that would be a legal catch. In those cases, the equipment or uniform are not displaced from their proper position.
|
Disagree. IMO, the word "uses" would show the need for intent. I would site the difference between a glove that comes off the hand as opposed to a glove thrown at a ball.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
|