No problem.

BNR said the second play was sent out as an NCAA video bulletin, as an example of a travel. BNR mentioned that before the video was sent out, he commented in this thread that the play was a travel.

JAR (you) asked what video this was (should have been obvious). You hoped it was sent out to remind officials not to miss this play.

Rich agreed it was a missed call, but thought it was not a big deal. Not worth more than a brief mention.

JAR (you) asked "mention to whom (NCAA officials) by whom (the NCAA)?

BNR said his post already mentioned that info (sent out as a video bulletin to NCAA officials by the NCAA).

JAR (you) said "No it doesn't" (it did).

AremRed (me) said "Read 'em (the posts) again".

JAR (you) replied "sometimes you have to speak really slowly to me" (what I am doing right now).

And that's where we are now. Make sense?