Thu Jan 16, 2014, 12:50pm
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,129
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by john5396
In many discussions here, I have seen the threshold for MC being "intent to injure". In this years official .ppt, NFHS presents this:
Suggested Parameters:
•Was the contact the result of intentional excessive force?
•Was there intent to injure?
The absence of these two conditions does not guarantee that malicious contact did not exist, they only provide a starting point for consideration!
Does this set of parameters change your threshold for what is MC?
|
No. It's (essentially) what I've always used.
|