View Single Post
  #35 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 13, 2014, 04:43pm
Manny A Manny A is offline
Stirrer of the Pot
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Lowcountry, SC
Posts: 2,380
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Ives View Post
The actual rules haven't been formalized so there is nothing yet for the players to approve/disapprove.
From the article:

Quote:
“However, what has been contemplated exceeds what was agreed to,” Clark told FOX Sports. “Because of that, we’re in the process of working through some of the issues as we see them.”
Sounds like there is disagreement in the "contemplated" proposals themselves. The players can speak of the merits of those proposals without having actual rules in place.

Besides, if it was really so black and white as you suggest, why run the story to begin with? And why would the MLBPA executive director feel a need to say anything? A simple, "Until we see the actual rules in writing, we will not make any comments," would have been more appropriate if that was the case.
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker
Reply With Quote