I still go back to
Adam's case book citation (4.18.2).
RULING: Both A1 and B1 are charged with a flagrant technical foul for fighting and are disqualified. A1's action is defined as fighting when the taunting caused B1 to retaliate by fighting. (Rule 10, Section 3; 10-3-6c: 10-3-8)
If you T A1 for her actions, then you have to eject her. You cannot penalize her actions (which would be Intentional Technical for dead ball contact, not an Unsporting Act), but then say it didn't lead to a fight.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AremRed
...
...
2. Unsporting tech on W43 for the initial arm thing.
...
|
That arm thing is called "dead ball contact", which is termed as an Intentional Technical Foul. You need to read
10-3-6 & 10-3-7.