Quote:
Originally Posted by stick
Thank you for your responses. On the way home I thought I may have been mistaken but not certain. I do know that any foul that occurs after a whistle is a dead ball foul which means it's either a technical or intentional. That means it would play out as Mark stated. But these two whistles were so close together that I did not consider it that way. I've never heard of taking a called foul back or ignoring a called foul. Is that something that's been done? Ironically after getting the coaches together and explaining the call the visiting teams coach was vociferously (but using clean language) arguing for a flagrant foul.
|
If your partners told you one foul happened before the other you can’t all of a sudden consider them simultaneous fouls (as opposed to just a plain old DF which would have been A1 and B1 fouling each another). As was said in other posts, the first foul – not the whistle resulting from the first foul – created the dead-ball situation. Anything you were going to call after that had to be some form of T.
__________________
"Everyone has a purpose in life, even if it's only to serve as a bad example."
"If Opportunity knocks and he's not home, Opportunity waits..."
"Don't you have to be stupid somewhere else?" "Not until 4."
"The NCAA created this mess, so let them live with it." (JRutledge)
|