Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkeyeCubP
"Hit" is in the NCAA-W manual, fwiw. "HitS" sounds plain stupid to me, personally.
Examples of backcourt violations that don't fit "over and back":
1) A thrown-in ball that is player-controlled in the frontcourt that then obtains backcourt status (last touched by A, first touched by A) never necessarily went "over the division line" before going "back."
|
You mean being in the frontcourt is not over the line but is behind the line?????
You're going to have to explain that one.
It is "being" over the line, not "going" over the line.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkeyeCubP
2) A jump ball that ends which then immediately results in a backcourt violation hasn't necessarily crossed the division line at all.
|
Same thing. I have no idea how the ball can gain FC status (which is necessary to have a violation) without it ever being "over" the line by nature of contact with the floor or in contact with a player who is in the FC (noting the definition of ball location).