View Single Post
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 11, 2013, 11:41am
just another ref just another ref is offline
We don't rent pigs
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,627
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam View Post
huh?



"What's the difference?" Really, what makes these even remotely related?
They are both case plays related to fouls. For the 4.19.8 play it is a stretch, in my opinion, to decide what the intent is. (when do you have to report both fouls?) The 4.19.11 case play is plain and simple. It says 2 fouls occur, and you penalize both. Not if you call it, and not if you rule it, just penalize two fouls, period. My question is why is the first (murky) case play undeniable and the second, clear cut play almost totally ignored.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.


Lonesome Dove

Last edited by just another ref; Fri Dec 13, 2013 at 02:42am.
Reply With Quote