View Single Post
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 05, 2013, 04:10pm
jTheUmp jTheUmp is offline
TODO: creative title here
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,250
How about you change you supposition from this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajmc View Post
... the possibility of ANY need to consider EXACTLY where the ball was at the split second the helmet came off
to this:
Quote:
... the possibility of ANY need to consider EXACTLY where the ball was at the split second the ballcarrier was down
Now does it seem RIDICULOUS AND OUTSIDE THE INTENT OF THIS RULE?
Reply With Quote