Quote:
Originally Posted by AremRed
Does this matter?? I think not. In the slo-mo replay I have LGP established at 0:16 into the video. Unless you are not referencing NFHS rules here, I don't see how anything he did lost LGP. He moved obliquely to his left, did not slide under once the offensive player was airbourne, etc.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JetMetFan
The man has a point...LGP requires two feet on the floor with the torso of the defender facing his/her opponent. Nothing about in the path.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AremRed
This makes me angry. It's a definition-within-a-definition. (insert Inception joke here)
|
Been away with family so I'm just now chiming in on the question to me...
See what APG said.
If it were not true, a defender could get LGP without even being near an opponent.
Imagine a fast break. B1 trailing A1 is facing A1 and probably has two feet down at some point in the play. Do you think B1 has LGP from such a position? Why or why not? Can you have LGP following someone from behind?
Would you think that it is sufficient for B1 to then be able to pass A1 and jump into their path with their back to A1, perhaps not even having their feet down? Would you say this is a charge? The did previous to being in the path did have two feet town and facing A1?
That is what anyone who argues that two feet down IN the path is not required is really saying.