Quote:
Originally Posted by hbk314
The rule is fine the way it's written. No need for a separate "philosophy" that only makes it easier to get the call wrong.
|
A crew chief I know is fond of saying "Well, that's life in the big city."
Philosophies have been around for years and are here to stay. They are a good thing because they lead to consistent enforcement of rules and help to standardize criteria on judgment calls.
Officials are trained at all levels in camps and clinics that there are six categories of defensive pass interference and if a particular play does not fall into one of these categories, you should not flag it. No where in the NCAA or NFHS rules will you find reference to these categories but they have been developed as a best practice through practical experience. The adherence to these categories helps ensure a more uniform enforcement of DPI and helps to take some of the subjectivity out of the call.
This is just one example, there are many other parts of the game where philosophies are applied and to good effect in my opinion.
The one unfortunate aspect of officiating philosophies is that they are not always well understood by the ignorant, which leads them to think that a play is officiated incorrectly when it was not.