Quote:
Originally Posted by Eastshire
Here's where I'm confused: It's not DPI because Gronk didn't try to ward off the defender and get to where he could make the catch but Rich points out such warding off would be OPI.
So it seems to me, Gronk reset his feet to move forward and then was driven back before the interception was made. Had there been no contact, I think Gronk could have taken a step and dove and had a slight chance of catching the ball.
Leaving that aside, it seems the initial contact clears Gronk out of the path of the secondary defender who makes the interception.
At the end of the day, that this play can reasonably be considered legal is a problem with the rules more than the refereeing.
|
I'm ignoring the contact on Gronk to see what I think would have happened without it.
Without it, he would have had to completely alter his momentum in ways no man his size has ever done, and then go through another defender (that would have been OPI) to catch the ball.
The contact on Gronk was certainly illegal; but the ruling is that it had no effect on the play because the interception occurred where (not "when') it did: before the ball got to the players involved in the DPI. It's as if Brady had just thrown it into the stands.