Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam
In this case, it wasn't done to draw the defense into the NZ. It was done to make them think a snap wasn't coming.
The proof of that, for me, is that the only three offensive players who moved were the snapper, the QB, and the WR.
To me, that makes it obvious that the actions were designed to make the defense think the snap wasn't imminent.
|
Ok, I can agree with that. But did they also do or say anything to lead the defense to believe there's a problem? The example doesn't just talk about a snap being not imminent, but also that there's some kind of problem. If they so much as said "what's the play" or something, then I'd agree it's illegal deception. But if they just looked over without simulating the snap or doing/saying something out of the ordinary, I say tough luck, legal deception.