Quote:
Originally Posted by scrounge
Thanks, but I can read pretty well. You can disagree, fine, but no need to be an ass about it.
|
It was not my intent to be an "ass" (and no need to call me one).
It's not a matter of disagreement - Your statement was a complete reversal of the actual rule we're talking about. If it was a typo as one suggested ... fine... but missing a "not" as a typo makes a pretty big difference, don't you think? Calling someone out for saying the opposite of the truth is not being an "ass".