View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat Nov 02, 2013, 01:47pm
All_Heart All_Heart is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 518
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
The question is assuming that either (a) there is no monitor and the officials judge the shot clock expired first, or (b) there is a monitor and after review it is determined that the shot clock expired first.

IOW, it doesn't matter whether there is a monitor or not -- that's not the point of the question.
Okay, if you think that is what they are looking for. I figured since they put in the time in overtime and it is under 2 minutes that they were looking for our knowledge on the new rule regarding monitor review of shot clock.
Reply With Quote