Quote:
Originally Posted by bluehair
why does your "temper" reason for a no-collision rule have to compete for importance with the injury prevention reason for a no-collision rule. These reasons don't conflict. Unless you deny that an injury prevention reason exists (deny a testosterone-filled teenager could seriously injure another), then to say that your temper reason is more significant than the injury prevention reason is just silly.
|
+100
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”
West Houston Mike
|