View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Oct 09, 2013, 11:26am
Bad Zebra Bad Zebra is offline
Official & Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,380
Quote:
Originally Posted by PG_Ref View Post
From a recent article on the internet ...

"Kentucky bans postgame handshakes

"While the KHSAA is announcing the ban, it is not administering its enforcement at the time the games end. Rather, opposing teams can still choose to have postgame handshakes but if a fight breaks out, it's not on the KHSAA; it's on the coaches and the officials, if they choose to stay." In fact, the statement posted in the largest, boldest font is this one:


They are going to try to hold officials responsible if a fight breaks out during postgame handshakes ... wow! Sounds like there may an increase in legal actions against officials in Kentucky, if this is accurate.
This is a perfect example of why certain people should be banned from reading ANYTHING on the internet. In reading the statement IN ITS ENTIRETY...the exact opposite is true. The article AND the commissioner clearly state that game officials do not, nor have they ever, had juridiction over these activities.

How does somebody take that conclusion away from the KHSAA statement???

Now Massachusetts is a whole different matter.
__________________
Calling it both ways...since 1999

Last edited by Bad Zebra; Wed Oct 09, 2013 at 11:46am.
Reply With Quote