Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjohn
I don't get why one part of the rule says nz and another part says enz.
|
Because presumably K blockers may be actively blocking beyond the NZ, into the ENZ. And if a low kick hits one of K in the ENZ (presumably blocking) it is ignored and there is no first touching.
The first part (Art 3) is about advancing a kick. The latter (Art 5) is about touching a kick.