Quote:
Originally Posted by AremRed
Yeah, he did mention it in the OP. However it was to let us know why he needed some plain leather Zigs. Other guys came in with the jokes, which are old and stale.
Billy is a vet, as many on this board are, and as long as he can run, make calls, and deal with coaches, his minor choice on uniform shouldn't be an issue.
Should that even be a factor? No.
|
Billy is a vet, sure, but his mentioning of it here was purely a joke. He's the one who keeps mentioning it, ad nauseum.
Now, as to whether it should be a factor in determining whether one goes to the state tournament. How many officials work the state tournament in a Byron collar?
It's going to go into the same category as facial hair, girth, and glasses. Nothing says we can't wear glasses, but you just won't see many (if any) officials at that level wearing them.
Should it be that way? I don't know. It doesn't really matter to me. One could argue how you are dressed when you arrive on site should not matter, either, but it will (in most locales).