Quote:
Originally Posted by MD Longhorn
I think that I've seen it before (Ok, sideways, not backward). I think that if I've seen it before it can't be completely unheard of.
But more importantly, asdf seems to be wanting to add his own determination as to when to kill a play out of a concern for safety. The rules makers do this for us. Anything more is not proper or appropriate. I could name 20 scenarios where someone is not "safe", depending on one persons viewpoint of what "safe" is... if we were to all make our own determinations regarding what is safe - and kill plays accordingly, we'd have a mess on our hands.
|
This play happened to my crew about 10 years ago.....
A32 catches a froward pass at B's 17 yards line. He takes three steps and is sandwiched between two defenders with a simultaneous hit. The hit not only forces a fumble, but it causes a compound fracture to A32's right arm in the process and he is bleeding profusely. B56 recovers the fumble and advances uninhibited towards A's goal line.
Seeing A32's compound fracture, the crew kills the play so that he can be attended to immediately.
There is nothing in the book that tells us to kill the play, yet we killed it anyway. B's head coach, irate at first, understood fully when he saw A32's injury, not that it made a difference to us.
MD.... you gonna swallow the whistle on this because the rules don't tell you to blow it?