Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteBooth
I think we can "guess" why there was not a protest. The original poster saw the play different from you. You have a different version and my gut tells me
if we asked several people who were at the game we would get a 3rd / 4th version.
Also, you say no interference BUT the batter held his bat high in the air according to the original OP.
Is that part correct according to you?
If so, there is a good case for an interference call. B1 is not supposed to have his bat high in the air when a play is going on.
Also, you said you were UIC so you should be backing the men and women in blue.
Manny was "spot on" in his answer as to why the 4 umpires didn't get together. There was no reason to. The other umpires would be overstepping their bounds had they interjected without the PU asking for help and if you are "truly" a UIC you should know that.
Sounds like you have a grudge against this particular group of umpires.
Pete Booth
|
I am smart enough to realize that when an unpire makes a mistake they should also be told they made a mistake. I was at the game. A mistake was made. I think it makes a big difference to me that I was at the game and not saying what happened as according to what someone told me. Did I want my brothers team to win, of course, that's why I never unpire their games. But my integrity is more important to me than any game. The plate umpire said he held the bat high. I don't think he did but that's his judgement. I already said that before. Can't argue with that. But the rule is not a judgement. A rule is a rule.
Anyone that knows me knows that rules are important to me.
About the protest. I was not in the conversation between the manager and the umpire. Regardless of that the plate umpire was wrong.