[QUOTE=Multiple Sports;903047][QUOTE=PeteBooth;902943][QUOTE]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Multiple Sports
Pete -
You are right, Being it is LL, the comparison may be a bit different. But ultimately, if I am responsible for umpires and you "volunteered" 20 dates
and someone else with 6 state championships under their belt is available and
has met LL qualifications and worked 1 game, I am taking him. If you don't like that, then you have to become a better umpire.
To be completely honest, I see a real trend in officiating today, where guys
are stepping out on the field or court poorly trained or not trained at all and are either in it for the money or are volunteering and then when "better" blues come along they are upset that they are getting pushed to the side.
Ultimately you are responsible for your own schedule........have you done everything you can do to ensure a good schedule.
Are you in the best shape / Is your uniform dry cleaned / do you know rules inside and out / do you have the best people skills (game management) / do you turn back game during the season.. All the above affecct your schedule in ways you have no idea....
Hope I didn't go off on a tangent, but nobody is owed anything in officiating.....
|
You are absolutely correct of course and that is the way we would all like it to be.
Maybe in your assigning life, you haven't come across this just yet, but if constantly keep pushing aside the less talented, but always available guy for the more talented, less availability guy, the always available guy eventually won't be available. It's a fine balancing act you have to walk as an assignor.