The main reason for RA is to prevent secondary defender from taking advantage by being there early for a charge, but if the so called secondary defender was there to defend his man, won't it be unfair to the defense that he has to make way & get out of position to let the dribbler pass, in this case he not only has to give up his position but also give up defending his man giving him a wide open under basket pass.
won't it be fairer to 1st determine whether the player trying to take a charge was actually there to defend the handler that went pass his primary defender?
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
It can't be a charge. that's all. It can be a no-call or a block.
NCAA. Don't know about FIBA.
|