View Single Post
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 15, 2013, 10:17pm
umpjim umpjim is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 769
Quote:
Originally Posted by Publius View Post
You just demonstrated my point.

In 4.03(a), the pitcher has committed a balk. Whether the catcher "caused" it is immaterial to the fact that the infraction was committed by the pitcher

7.07 is the so-called "catcher's balk", wherein the pitcher has not committed a balk, but is charged with one anyway due to illegal action by the catcher.

Five cents, please.
Sounds like six of one, half a dozen of the other. In both cases, the pitcher should not release the ball if he sees the catcher violating the rule. But not releasing would still be a balk. Good luck with that. In 7.07 if he has already released the ball it's unfair that he gets the balk. OBR doesn't care. They need a way to advance all runners.
But, back to the real world.

Last edited by umpjim; Mon Jul 15, 2013 at 10:21pm.
Reply With Quote