Thanks to all for the discussion. As noted by two posters...
Quote:
|
Here's another: Not all "acts" considered by the defense to be interference are interference.
|
I brought the topic up because I had the situation of the defense changing her actions (moving a step toward the infield) to avoid hitting the retired runner with the throw. The throw was late but close. I called the batter-runner safe, no interference.
The defensive coach politely but strenuously disagreed. She said I should have called a double-play because of the runner's actions. I explained to the coach a runner simply continuing in her forward momentum she was not committing an act to hinder the defense, and that as long as she wasn't committing some other act (like throwing up her arms to block a throw, or running into F4 while she was making the throw) she was not interfering.
I know this topic has been discussed here before and I thank you all for letting me air it out again. The coach had me second-guessing myself afterwards.
Scott