Quote:
Originally Posted by youngump
As I understood your post, you were telling Cecil that he could find what he was looking for (written instruction that a ball hitting a moving bat was to be considered the bat hitting the ball regardless of which hit which) in RS24. RS24 doesn't say that which was my point.
|
No, my reference was were to go to find the bat to ball, ball to bat note
Quote:
As to the rest of what you just wrote, I'm not quite sure what you mean.
7-6-K Exception 2 reads: (in the 2008 book)
When the batter drops the bat and the ball rolls against the bat in fair
territory, and, in the umpire’s judgment, there was no intent to interfere
with the ball.
EFFECT: The ball is live.
This is certainly possible and it's an exception to 7-6-K which is the answer to your other question. (unless that's moved)
So I think mostly what I'm saying is I'm missing something about the whole recent flow of the conversation.
|
How can a player who has batted the ball into fair territory still be a batter?
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Last edited by IRISHMAFIA; Tue Apr 16, 2013 at 09:45pm.
|