View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 02, 2013, 02:24pm
Rich Ives Rich Ives is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by celebur View Post
To be fair. . .yes, yes you did. But so did BS, who also pasted the surrounding text:



This can be read that:
a) certain types of obstruction require a warning, and
b) subsequent obstruction (of any kind) by the same fielder results in added penalties, even ejection.

This is clearly not what Manny meant, but it could be taken this way.
That says ejection is a possible penalty, not a required penalty.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote