View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 20, 2003, 10:54am
CecilOne CecilOne is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
OK if "the runner on first had passed second when the interference had occurred. ", that runner still stays at 2nd, not 3rd. Just that she gets 2nd for having reached it, as opposed to being forced.

As to "the umpire that made the call has worked HS ball in the past", is this why it's "in the past" or is this just another proof the OJT is not enough?
Reply With Quote