Quote:
Originally Posted by BretMan
For the OP...
- Mary is out. Any outs made by runners already on base during the improper batter's time at bat stand.
- Alice's time at bat is negated. She's not out. It's just like she never batted.
- Mike (the batter who should have batted) is out on the appeal.
Two outs. Fred is the next batter.
Because co-ed batting orders are by their nature convoluted.
Since we're talking co-ed here, the goal is to maintain the alternating male-female batting order. If Alice were to bat again, the rules would be forcing two same-sex batters to follow each other, which is not in the spirit of co-ed play.
The perceived advantge is that you could potentially have two male batters back-to-back, an advantage that is not intended by the rules.
|
Perceived, yes. Real, no.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
|