Thread: Obscure Rule
View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 09, 2013, 05:10pm
Rich Ives Rich Ives is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by RPatrino View Post
Rich, they 'appealed' the runner at first leaving early. The implied appeal being the throw back to first after the catch of the line-drive.
I know that. That's not my issue.

They couldn't/didn't "again" appeal the runner at third because he wasn't appealed in the first place.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote