Quote:
Originally Posted by Toren
Not exactly. They are saying that Team A maintained Team control (we all agree on that) and that Team A caused the ball to have backcourt status (We can all agree on that).
So, the touching by Team A in the backcourt, before it bounced, was a simultaneous front court, back court touching.
It took me about 1 full day to get my mind wrapped around it, but I can dig it.
|
So, again, you (and they) are saying the rule book is wrong?
Causing the ball to have backcourt status has nothing to do with the backcourt rule. Causing to have backcourt status is not illegal in any way.
That is just not a violation according to the rule. To be a violation, A must have been the last to touch the ball BEFORE it gained backcourt status. And before is not the same as simultaneous.