View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 17, 2003, 11:30am
greymule greymule is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 3,100
I think we determined in a thread last October that "not higher than the batter's head" was superfluous and confusing in ASA.

Case book play 1-58 is no help, because though it supposedly deals with a foul tip, it uses a fair ball as its basis! The play does say that "because the catcher went to the ball, this should be ruled a legal catch," so we derived at least some wisdom from that.

In short, the consensus was that a foul ball could fail to rise over the batter's head and still be caught for an out (not a tip). For example, a ball that was softly blooped off the bat such that the catcher had to dive to the right for it would be a catch, not a foul tip.

__________________
greymule
More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men!
Roll Tide!
Reply With Quote