View Single Post
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 20, 2013, 09:59pm
IRISHMAFIA IRISHMAFIA is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by RKBUmp View Post
You talking about a play like this?

Recording 201252274241 - YouTube
IMO, this was a pitiful call, period. There is no way this can be justified as interference without making unfounded presumptions.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manny A View Post
Please answer primarily for NCAA, ASA, and NFHS.

Sitch: R1 on first, no outs. B2 hits a little looper to F6. R1 takes off for second, but then stops thinking that F6 will make the catch. The ball skips into F6's glove. F6 tosses the ball to F4 at second base to retire R1, who is now just jogging towards the bag. F4 then throws to first to make a play on B2, and the throw hits R1 in the shoulder while she's between the two bases.

Is R1 guilty of interference?
As stated above, no. I'm sure there will be people who will try to justify an INT call, but I would consider it OOO.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote