Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Slick
However, they are expected (explicitly by rule) to not interfere. Remember, the act does not need to be intentional:
Yes, umpires discuss this play all the time. I'm surprised someone hasn't said "if she was doing what she was suppose to do . . ." Well, she suppose to not interfere.
I'm a pretty hard line guy on this, and I teach the hard line stance. The key to Bret's language is "instant" -- anything longer than an instant, I've got interference. For example, in the linked video, yes, interference (that was way more than an instant). The other one was the Tennessee player (shown in the SUP online clinic). I've got interference on that one too, and that was real close to "instant." You don't have to give yourself up, but you cannot interfere.
I only posted the NCAA rule, but the same in all codes.
Yes, I know. Other will disagree.
|
I know this will come up Sunday, but the definition says :
1.72 Interference- equipment or the act of an offensive player...
What "act" of interference did she commit?