View Single Post
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Wed Feb 20, 2013, 09:41am
bluehair bluehair is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: North, TX
Posts: 256
OK, my mistake. I thought you had a problem with the free foot. But I was talking about a hybrid possible being a legal set position.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dash_riprock View Post
The "hybrid" stance I am familiar with has F1 with his pivot foot across (perpendicular to) the rubber and his free foot in front of, and often past the side edge of, the rubber. This is not legal.
What in your hybrid variation makes it not a legal set position?
His pivot foot ? cite please.
His free foot ? cite please
Reply With Quote