Quote:
Originally Posted by BLydic
Left foot looked like it was lifted prior to the dribble ... by the book, a travel.
|
Even by the book it is super nit-picky. If you call this a travel at the men's D1 level you are going to get weird looks from both of your partners and both coaches.
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
So when you say this travel, still not sure what you mean. What it he had lifted the pivot 6" off the floor before the dribble, rather than 1/2" ?
Where do you draw the line?
|
The "travel" had zero impact on the play. He's putting the ball on the floor and
maybe lifted his pivot foot a half second before releasing the ball. Super, super nit-picky. Don't be a detective!
Quote:
Originally Posted by ODog
It's the classic "drop-step travel."
|
No it's not ... it's not even a drop-step!
Quote:
Originally Posted by ODog
You can debate whether it should/would be called. But you can't debate it's a travel. As CRust said, it's not even close, either. Pretending it is just to back up your personal philosophy on rules you choose to overlook (and we all have some, me included) is lame.
|
I think that's exactly what you are debating.
This "travel" had zero impact on the play. ZERO. It is barely noticeable. If you blow your whistle on this play at this level (really, any level, but especially men's D1), everyone is going to pause and wonder what the hell you called —*because no one will know.
It's super nit-picky ... it's like finding 3-seconds on the post player who has half a foot on the lane line, but the ball is nowhere near him. "By the book"? Yes. Something you should call? No.
In this game if you call this a travel you are going to be the only one calling it ... and you won't be around to call it very long.
The player-control foul is the obvious, super obvious correct call on this play.