Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Casebook play 3.5.5SitA(c) is very explicit with regards to jewelry,and covers Juulie's sitch perfectly.
|
That's fine JR but whether we agree or not, this case DOES NOT fit Juulie's play perfectly. This case play is about a sub entering the game, not a player who is in the game who is improperly equipped and about to shot a FT.
|
I was referring to the statement used in this casebook play-"A6 simply cannot participate until the illegal items are removed".It cites rule 3-5-6 as the reason why-"Jewelry shall NOT be worn".That's a pretty explicit,all-encompassing statement,too.Pre-game warmups are covered similarly in casebook play 3.5SitB.We do disagree then,because I think that there are no situations during your jurisdiction where you would allow any player,whether they are playing or warming up,to wear jewelry.I think that was the intent of the rule.
You see Dick Knox sometimes during the summer,don't you Tony?Why don't you run this one by him,and get his opinion?