Thread: One foot OOB...
View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 09, 2003, 12:23pm
mick mick is offline
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Houghton, U.P., Michigan
Posts: 9,953
Thumbs up Good question !

Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
OK, try again...

In Mick's post he pointed us to the nfhs changes, where we can find this:


4-23 Clarified that in order for a player to establish legal guarding position, both feet must be touching the “playing court.”


I responded:



Puts an end to the age-old question "can a defensive player stand with 1 foot OOB", doesn't it?


But of course it does no such thing. All the clarification does is tell us where the defender must be to *establish* legal guarding position. We all know that once LGP has been established the defender can move, and nowhere does it say he cannot move OOB with one foot (ignoring the T, which we should). Now, let's say the defender establishes (or thinks he establishes) LGP when having 1 foot OOB and then moves to take a charge without re-establishing LGP (say one foot in bounds, the other not on the floor). Ya gotta go with the block? Maybe it's just me but I don't see how the clarification helps.
At first blush, I consider "unauthorized leaving of the court" at second blush I consider "spirit and intent".
YU.P., ...good question.
mick


Had a thought. (That's one in a row!)

Can a defender maintain legal guarding position by stepping away from the ball handler toward OOB? Probably not.

[Edited by mick on May 9th, 2003 at 12:26 PM]
Reply With Quote