Quote:
Originally Posted by tomegun
....
Can you explain your rationale? A1 is given 1 and 1 when it should be two free throws. A1 misses the first one, A2 gets the rebound and scores. The horn sounds, the officials realize it should have been two shots for A1, but he can't shoot them because A2 scored. Is that what you mean?
|
Your recap is my rationale
If the officials hadn't erred Team A would not have scored FG. I just don't like the feel of a team having a throw-in when then they should have been shooting 1-and-1, they hit a three, the horn sounds, now they hit 2 free throws. A 5-point play b/c of an officiating error.
I just feel that if they score on a possession that should never have occurred then it is redundant to then go back and give them some free throws.
(and please, no one re-hash the old "the other team's coach should have spoken up" crappola argument
)