Quote:
Originally Posted by maven
According to my state, no: that would be an INT.
According to Washington state, it seems yes: that's a stationary elbow.
How two stationary non-abutting objects could possibly collide is beyond me.  |
Stationary is a poor choice of words given the discussion around what they want called. As described by the NFHS, it is as Washington is doing...elbows moving no faster than the body are considered "stationary" (read as fixed) relative to the body. Moving faster than the body, intentional.