Quote:
Originally Posted by asdf
The foul was for a hit on a defenseless receiver, not for illegal helmet contact.
|
Is that what the official said? (I have no audio for these clips here at work, and thought they said helmet contact when I saw this live).
OK, if that's the case, I'm back to my original question... is this REALLY where we want the league to go --- a receiver who has the ball in his hands and has not yet dropped it is considered defenseless?