Quote:
Originally Posted by rockyroad
No you do not have his position right...
He is saying that he will call a violation on the defender before calling a block on the defender for having a foot oob. Since by rule the defender violated before there was any contact.
Now please explain why you think that is absurd...
|
Exactly. The rule simply says a player can't have LGP. It says nothing about the spot itself being illegal.
To me, the absurd position is the one that insists 4-37-3 doesn't apply because B1 isn't on the "playing court" but B1 hasn't violated because he somehow hasn't left the court.