View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 06, 2012, 05:10pm
Nevadaref Nevadaref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref View Post
It shouldn't and it didn't. In the OP, if I understand correctly, the official refused to allow a sub after the second free throw because there was no sub at the table when he checked after the first.
Oh, I see the disconnection now. I was responding to the post which you quoted BillyMac and my citation was to support what he wrote, which was for a more general situation.

We agree about the situation in the OP. That substitute met the requirement of the rule which I cited and what BillyMac said.
Reply With Quote