View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 30, 2012, 12:30am
Nevadaref Nevadaref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
And BBR's 'conjecture' cannot be the reason they changed the rule?
It could be under the present set-up of the game, but remember that this could go back to when the lane was only six feet wide. Under that court situation, a player along the lane did not have to violate in order to GT a FT.
Reply With Quote