View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 21, 2012, 12:11am
Sharpshooternes Sharpshooternes is offline
C'mon man!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 966
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
If one of those subs was for B1, I'd be inclined to let the coach make the change. I'm all for a coach taking care of a problem player as soon as possible...but the rule says you wait until after all but the last shot of multiple shots.

Yes, the fouled player is the one who shoots those FTs.

As for an intentional technical foul...it is possible I suppose but there isn't any reason to have such a thing since there is no practical difference between that and a basic technical foul. I suppose you could could call dead ball contact fouls as an intentional technical but there is no point.
Now what if there is an intentional foul followed by retaliatory intentional foul (ie fouled player A1 calls fouler B1 a naughty name like jackwagon) and you have A6 and B6 ready to sub in. This is what I am thinking: This is a false double foul situation. Administer in the order of occurence. A1 shoots intentional foul shots, (here's the kicker) B6 is subing in for B1 to shoot the technical foul shots. So I would think at this point both A6 and B6 could enter the game. Now, who gets the ball? Don't want to say AP because that seems to easy. Thanks everyone, trying to wrap my head around this scenario.
Reply With Quote