View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 02, 2003, 07:45am
CecilOne CecilOne is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Re: The rule statement is confusing.

Quote:
Originally posted by DownTownTonyBrown
... snip ... The rulebook has two requirements and they don't agree.
... snip ... These statements are not the same and they really don't reinforce each other.
I don't see how these are contradictory. If something can't happen any time during the game, then it can't happen in the same half inning or in the same whole inning or in the same at bat or whenever. All we really need is "The same courtesy runner may not run for both the pitcher and the catcher. (period) ", but redundant rules are better than unanswered questions.
What needs to be more clearly stated is that the CR is running for a position and not a player. If #33 was a CR for the #12 as the pitcher and #12 moves from pitcher to catcher, #33 can not be a CR for #12 as a catcher.
Reply With Quote