View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 04, 2012, 08:46am
Scrapper1 Scrapper1 is offline
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by BayStateRef View Post
Yes. As a Note to 2-2-4.

The language in the note that Scrapper1 asked about was inserted last year.
Absolutely correct. So I wonder why the part that I quoted in my original post is highlighted as new in this year's book? Another editorial snafu?

I remembered the "clerical" part of the note from last year's changes, but the state association "interceding" part didn't ring a bell.

Strange.
Reply With Quote