View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Aug 30, 2012, 01:56pm
MD Longhorn MD Longhorn is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ View Post
Batter squibs a ball that hugs the 1st base line. He runs to first and about the time he catches up to the ball he hit (just before the running lane), the pitcher arrives to field the ball. The pitcher slows down almost to a stop to avoid running into the batter. The ball ended up going foul. The next pitch the batter grounded out to first. Had the pitcher been able to field the ball, it would have been fair, but he "chose" to let it go (either because the batter-runner made him break stride OR to let it roll hoping it would go foul).
Could interference have been called?

JJ
Of course. Interference is a dead ball, so if it was called, the fact that it rolled foul is immaterial. PS - running lane is immaterial here. All that matters is --- did he interfere with the pitcher's ability to make a play (while the ball was in fair territory).
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote