View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 27, 2012, 12:04pm
UmpTTS43 UmpTTS43 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 425
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
Um ... based on your OWN WORDS, calling int would be wrong. If you protected F2 - then the collision between runner and F3 is obstruction, not interference. (PS - Mr. Rolleyes... routine or not has nothing to do with this - if you really think it does, please ask this at your next clinic. What matters is - which fielder does the UMPIRE think is going to make the play? That fielder is protected, and no one else.)
I don't know how you infer that. I would have protected F3 hence the INT.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
Egads ... two in the same thread. NO. Interference is a dead ball. The ball's status is DEAD.
A] not all INT results in an immediate dead ball B] you keep the ball live until the status is determined for the IFF. If you kill it right away you may deprive the defense from completing the IFF ie catch, touching it fair. If the ball is fair, you would have two outs, if the ball is foul, you have one out and batter back up to bat.

Same is true for type A OBS on the batter runner. If the ball is a fly ball or fair/foul status is in question you keep it live until the play is over.

Last edited by UmpTTS43; Mon Aug 27, 2012 at 12:12pm.
Reply With Quote