Thread: Obstruction?
View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 21, 2012, 10:39am
Manny A Manny A is offline
Stirrer of the Pot
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Lowcountry, SC
Posts: 2,380
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
Um, ok. I see why you think that. That is NOT what the rule is for. Merely positioning one's body somewhat in the way is not OBS under this rule. Perhaps they should word it more specifically, although they DID include the word intentionally.
Yeah, I'm not sure what they were thinking about when they came up with this rule.

I've heard of a play where F6 cuts in front of a leading-off runner at second to screen his vision from F1 just as F1 attempts a pickoff with F4 covering. Maybe they were concerned with this particular situation? I dunno...

Suffice it to say the concept of "visual obstruction" does exist. As KJUmp mentioned, it certainly appears in NCAA Softball under 9.4.2.3 to address the tag-up situation I brought up. And under 9.4.2.7, NCAA Softball covers the original post scenario, but it's not the typical obstruction ruling. Rather, it's a warn and then a one-base award if the same player does it again.
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker
Reply With Quote